Thought for the Day
Aug. 6th, 2002 07:41 amToday got me thinking about US History. We all get certain dates drilled into us:
December 7th
June 6th
July 4th
September 11th is going to be a big one
So why not August 6th? I would think that the impact that August 6th had on both US history and humanity itself would make it at least as, if not more, important than all these other dates, but maybe that's just me.
December 7th
June 6th
July 4th
September 11th is going to be a big one
So why not August 6th? I would think that the impact that August 6th had on both US history and humanity itself would make it at least as, if not more, important than all these other dates, but maybe that's just me.
An apple under a tree.
Date: 2002-08-06 07:46 am (UTC)I find it funny (funny sad, not funny "ha ha") that when people talk about how wrong it was to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing the immediate and eventual deaths of 240,000 Japanese civilians, the brutal genocide being perpetuated by the Japanese government is rarely mentioned. When the Japanese sent supplies to their troops in the field, they sent Chinese women along with the food and ammuntion; these women were raped to death. Not raped once. Not raped twice. Raped time after time, until they died of internal bleeding and shock. Can you imagine lying on a pile of sand, far from home, hungry, thirsty, naked, being raped by strangers, a long line of them, one after the other, until something inside tore open and you were allowed to die, only so that the woman chained up next to you, and the woman chained up next to her, could serve the same purpose?
If only speaking of war trivia it is of historical interest that we are the first people to use an atomic bomb, more specifically as a non-tactical attack (if the Japanese had not surrendered when they did, three more atomic bombs would have been tactially deployed to clear the way for the three companies we would have been used to breach the main-land). Personally, I find the moral debate about the weapons' usage to be rather offensive. August 6th, 1945 isn't a day we decided to go out and attack a foreign country for the express purpose of seizing territory and subjugating foreign populations; the Japanese began doing that a decade earlier. Yes, we are guilty of attacking civilian population centers, but at the time, that was the basis on which any war was fought. When fighting a country, thousands of air raids were flown to destroy factories and government facilities. There was no concept of "smart bombs," only the practice of flying a few thousand feet over the city and dropping such massive amounts of ordinance that the target was guaranteed to be destroyed if by nothing more than sheer chance. At that point in history (at least more so than now), war meant brutal retaliation against the civilian infrastructure to destroy a country's capacity to wage war. The atomic bombs were in fact far more efficient at this than anything we could have used at the time; they had the added threat of being utterly unstoppable by the Japanese, which is in large part the reason the Japanese government was "allowed" to surrender without losing face, thus ending what would have certainly continued to be a brutal and costly (in lives) war.
It is most certainly an awful weapon. But eight hundred years ago, the Christian church called the crossbow "a weapon of such horrible violence, that no Christian should wield it against another human, be they infidel or devout." War is awful. Awful weapons will be used from now until the end of time. We used an awful weapon to attack a nation which we had been in a protracted war with for nearly four years, a country which had been invading most of south-east Asia for the last decade, forcing huge populations into brutal internment projects that killed millions of civilians. Japan knew we had nuclear weapons at our disposal, but their government continued to engage in the war, understanding full well (but I can only assume desperately hoping not) that we had the capacity to use those nuclear weapons. I think we, as a population, both the U.S.'s and the world's, find it hard to muster sympathy for a couple hundred thousand dead people who helped to power a government that slaughtered millions without provocation.
--me
P. S.: I dearly hope you are referring to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and not some personally meaningful occurence I have never heard of.
Re: An apple under a tree.
Date: 2002-08-06 07:55 am (UTC)This from Tadatoshi Akiba, Mayor of Hiroshima (http://www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp/peacesite/English/Stage3/S3-2E.html).
A sentiment I can agree with.
Date: 2002-08-06 08:13 am (UTC)--me
Invasion of the Idiot Dog Brain
Date: 2002-08-06 07:49 am (UTC)--me
Re: Invasion of the Idiot Dog Brain
Date: 2002-08-06 08:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-06 11:54 am (UTC)It'll be on email lists passed around university faculties that say "The current generation ... is too young to remember the attacks on September 11th / Doesn't know any living world war II veterans / etc."
It'll be like the Challenger disaster, or the fall of Saigon, or flooding in some third world country. Sure, a lot of people died, but wasn't that years ago? And besides, there's something new on TV ....
... and this is all assuming an even bigger terrorist attack doesn't happen between now and then, either.
I'm feeling rather cynical today, excuse me.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-06 02:33 pm (UTC)-- Schwa ---
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-06 02:43 pm (UTC)Err, anyways. I guess I compared the Challenger to September 11 to Oklahoma City to Columbine all because they all had about the same effect on me. Precious little.
Don't get me wrong, I was as interested in the news of what happened as anyone else, but I wasn't directly affected nor was anyone I know, and as far as my life goes now, 99.99% of it is exactly the same as it was on September 10th. And I think that's the same for most Americans.
If we get a new Federal holiday out of it, fine, just don't take away one of the 10 we get already.
Re:
Date: 2002-08-06 02:59 pm (UTC)Lessee... if I rememember correctly:
Columbine high school hi-jinks
Oklahoma City bombing
The storming of the Waco compound
Quite possibly Ruby Ridge, but I could be wrong, and besides, it didn't make much news, and...
Hitler's birthday!
-- Schwa ---
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-06 03:03 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-06 03:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-06 03:11 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-06 03:17 pm (UTC)Yes, jokes will be made but EVERYBODY will know what September 11th was. April 20th? Not so much. Can you tell me the date of The Challenger? There's a distinct differnce in how they will be remembered.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-08-06 11:22 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-07 06:18 am (UTC)It's all about perspective. In 100 years a couple people will remember, but no one will care about September 11, 2001.
I don't think this is true, people still care about December 7th. It may not be as potent and important as it was years ago, but it's remembered and cared about. Furthermore, as to perspective, if things keep going as they are with changes in civil liberties etc. people are certainly going to remember 9/11 as the reason all that changed.
Yes, as you said earlier 99. whatever % of the people's lives haven't changed, but our perceptions of our safety, of our role in the world etc. have and 9/11 will be remembered as the cause of that. I don't think one hundred years is going to wash this one away.
Re:
Date: 2002-08-14 03:11 pm (UTC)But, then again, that's just the way I am.