(no subject)
Feb. 26th, 2004 12:08 pmAnd then....the oral sex! Then again, maybe not.
And, unlike the oral sex/breast cancer thing that circulates every few months, this is, unfortunately, real science.
And, unlike the oral sex/breast cancer thing that circulates every few months, this is, unfortunately, real science.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-26 09:13 am (UTC)Thankfully, I've already resigned myself to dying from cancer (and I don't drink or smoke, just use a lot of electronics), so this is kind of a non-issue. It's certainly not going to end my oral sexlife.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-26 10:41 am (UTC)It's not so much "namby-pamby inconclusiveness of the science" as it is the fact that it's just one of those diseases that isn't a straightforward case of transmission, symptom, diagnosis, cure.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-02-26 06:18 pm (UTC)So hooray. Women should be getting annual pap smears anyway to control for the cervical cancer. Now maybe we should all go in once a year to check for abnormal cells on the mouth...
It goes both ways
Date: 2004-02-26 03:43 pm (UTC)Sex is like scary and stuff. I'm going to stick with my intensive yoga program till I can fold in half.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-01 10:55 am (UTC)1) you can't test 'til you have an outbreak
2) you can be a carrier and never have an outbreak - and still put people at risk (!)
3) facts are inconclusive about big chunks of transmission data.
Had an interesting talk with this doctor I know about it recently, and she had several cases, in different locations, with herpes outbreaks in which there was no sexual history for the victim. At all. Fully grown adults, in their 50s and stuff (nuns, all, interestingly - and yes, from different convent-things) - raging primary cases.
BTW - I added you a while back after the Boston meetup but forgot to tell you.